Reform UK MP Lee Anderson faced backlash over the weekend after taking aim at Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer for accepting hospitality tickets to football matches. Anderson, who represents Ashfield, criticised Starmer for receiving free tickets to Arsenal games, only for his own record of accepting hospitality to be highlighted by critics.
The controversy began when it was revealed that Starmer had accepted £12,588 in gifts, including over £6,000 worth of tickets to Arsenal matches. The Labour leader explained that his decision to accept these tickets was based on security advice, as his usual seat would require increased taxpayer spending on security measures.
Despite this explanation, MPs from opposing parties took to social media to criticise Starmer, with Anderson among the most vocal.
You may also like: Robert Jenrick faces scrutiny over mystery £75,000 donation
Anderson’s Social Media Attack Backfires
Anderson posted a photo of himself at Nottingham Forest’s Premier League match against Fulham, commenting: “Not to Free Gear Keir. MPs can sit in the stands with fans.” His remark appeared to mock Starmer’s acceptance of hospitality tickets, implying that MPs should sit with regular fans rather than in hospitality suites.
However, Anderson’s attempt to criticise Starmer quickly backfired. Social media users were quick to point out that Anderson himself had accepted hospitality tickets in the past. Records from the MP’s register of interests show that he has received tickets from both Nottingham Forest and Notts County.
Glass Houses and Stones
The situation drew comparisons to the well-known proverb, “people in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.” Anderson’s history of accepting hospitality left him open to accusations of hypocrisy, undermining his attack on Starmer.
Critics were quick to remind Anderson that the register of MPs’ interests is publicly available and that any hospitality he received is a matter of public record. While Anderson’s post may have been intended as a jab at Starmer, it ended up highlighting his own participation in similar practices.
Political Criticism of Starmer’s Arsenal Tickets
Starmer’s acceptance of Arsenal tickets has drawn significant attention, with opponents questioning whether it is appropriate for a political leader to accept such gifts. However, Starmer has defended his actions, citing cost-saving measures and security concerns as the primary reasons for accepting hospitality.
The debate over MPs accepting hospitality from football clubs and other organisations is not new, and both sides of the political spectrum have been subject to scrutiny.
