Newspaper correction from Michael Rosen interview is amazing

‘Pre-order your copy of Getting Better here: https://t.co/7K2cOwBA0F’ pic.twitter.com/tmguiW6n9O

— Michael Rosen 💙💙🎓🎓 (@MichaelRosenYes) December 20, 2022

I didn't trust myself to post this before in case my tweet was covered in speckles of blood caused by my rage on reading it.https://t.co/DIH6ZW0E5P

— Michael Rosen 💙💙🎓🎓 (@MichaelRosenYes) March 1, 2023

Apart from that, ⁦@MichaelRosenYes,⁩ how did you enjoy the ⁦@thetimes⁩ article? pic.twitter.com/qSh8Rp3iLN

— David Brindle (@DavidJ_Brindle) February 28, 2023

Ahem

— Michael Rosen 💙💙🎓🎓 (@MichaelRosenYes) February 28, 2023

It might have been quicker Michael to point out the *accurate* parts of the interview 😂

— Alexis 🙏🏽🍷🌎 (@TocquevilleJnr) March 1, 2023

I suspect if you’d cleared your throat during the interview it would have been a fart in print.

— Mark Hinman (@HinmanMark) February 28, 2023

Yes! Read this yesterday and ended up wondering what if anything they got right. Bizarre. Are all interviews in the @thetimes actually works of fiction?

— Rob Wright (@RobWright126) March 1, 2023

Well. I suppose they got his name right https://t.co/OTSkJG9BEI

— ☮️ John Fielder – #NeverAgain for anyone (@JohnFielder1) March 1, 2023

who did the interview, boris johnson?

— Elizabeth🌹🇪🇺 (@gsvnfa) February 28, 2023

Wow. Call the Pulitzer Prize Committee right now….!

— Willow the Wisp (@WilloTheWisp99) February 28, 2023

The Times should have won a Fiction prize for this heap of garbage.

— Robert K (@Robert_K_UK) March 1, 2023