Daily Mail story pulled apart by Hacked Off
"This piece in @DailyMail Mail on Sunday is understood to be substantively misleading."
Home » Daily Mail
"This piece in @DailyMail Mail on Sunday is understood to be substantively misleading."
"Back off," one person said simply and yes, you read that right, united the internet!
"No surprise, and probably written by someone who hasn’t seen it," said one person in response.
Carol Vorderman highlighted the irony, tweeting, “Funny how their ‘human rights’ matter to the Mail when money is involved!”
"Pointless in so many ways," wrote one person.
Well played gents...
"She’s going to be really cross when she finds out who’s been running Britain for the past 13 years."
"Here lies satire, dearly beloved, much missed."
Well this backfired...
'There’s a word for this, and I’m not sure it’s “journalism.”'
"How dare the BBC indoctrinate children with established scientific fact," wrote James Felton.
"Perfectly normal country, definitely not sliding into fascism…"
Lightning doesn't strike twice. or does it?!
"Daily Mail is just stoking toxic division again."
The Daily Mail went after the 'hard-left union leader' behind doctors' strikes.